William Shakespeare's Romeo+Juliet

Leonardo DiCaprio, Claire Danes, John Leguizamo
20th Century Fox 1997
Did this pre-date the Ethan Hawke adaptation of Hamlet? Regardless, it's in the same vein, by holding the original text of the play, and simply adapting the setting to a slightly fantastical version of modern times - while this one looks like California (Venice Beach?), Hawke's Hamlet made Denmark a giant corporation.
While comparisons are, of course, useless in describing the movie itself, they are essential in showing effectiveness of the purpose. I'll just say that I thought Hawke's Hamlet was brilliant, but this movie was OK.
It's not that I didn't like it - it's just . . . it seemed as though the only good actors, the only ones who really brought forth the meaning behind the words, were the adult actors. Honestly, ALL of the actors under the age of 30 were wooden, stilted, and delivered the lines as though they were reading the ingredients off a cardboard box. Shakespeare, regardless of what setting or special effects you use, has to be FELT. None of the young'uns felt it. The Priest, and Mr's and Mrs's Montagues/Capulets, well, I got the sense that each of them cut their chops on the plays of the Bard, while the Danes and the DiCaprios might have done one play in high school and that was it.
Overall, the cinemetography was good, and many colours to delight the visual senses. The words are beautiful, because the dialogue was written by one of those rare true geniuses that Almighty God in His wisdom occasionally gives to us humans - but the delivery by half the staff was frankly, less than thrilling.
Maybe they'll do a better job on a remake when they're in their fifties.
VG


